Home › Textile Costing › Lecture 10
Textile Costing · Lecture 10

Costing Systems II — Process Costing

Averaging costs over masses of similar units, with and without work in process — the equivalent-units method at Sino-Pak Textiles.
Process costingEquivalent unitsWIP

Job costing versus process costing

In process costing the cost of a product is obtained by using broad averages to assign costs to masses of similar units — identical items mass-produced for general sale, not for a specific customer. The principal difference from job costing is the extent of averaging: individual jobs use different quantities of resources, so it would be wrong to cost each at the same average; when like units are mass-produced, averaging over all units produced is exactly right.

Example. Sino-Pak Textiles spins only Ne 20/1 for the moment. Assume one direct-cost category (direct materials); conversion costs include labour, indirect materials, energy, plant depreciation and so on.

Case I — no beginning or ending work in process (January)

January — all units started and completed
AB
1Started and completed (bags)
2Direct materials cost added
3Conversion cost added
4Total manufacturing cost30,000,000
5Direct materials cost per bag3,000
6Conversion cost per bag2,000
7Average cost per bag5,000
blue = input (edit me)grey = formula (click to see it)

Case II — no beginning but an ending WIP (February)

6,000 bags are started, 5,000 completed and 1,000 remain in process, on average 60% complete as to conversion (materials are added at the start, so they are 100% complete). Dividing 29,200,000 by 6,000 physical units would give 4,867 per bag — wrong, because the unfinished bags have not absorbed all their conversion cost. Equivalent units fix this.

February — equivalent units
ABCD
1Flow of productionPhysical unitsDirect materialsConversion
2Completed and transferred out5,0005,000
3Work in process, ending1,000600
4 % complete: materials / conversion
5Equivalent units of work done6,0006,0005,600
6Costs added during February
7Cost per equivalent unit3,0002,000
8Average cost per completed bag5,000
9Cost of bags transferred out25,000,000
10Cost of ending WIP4,200,000
blue = input (edit me)grey = formula (click to see it)

Case III — both beginning and ending WIP (March, weighted average)

March opens with 1,000 bags in process (materials 100%, conversion 60%) carrying 3,000,000 of materials and 1,200,000 of conversion; 5,500 bags are started, 6,000 completed, 500 remain (materials 100%, conversion 50%). The weighted-average method pools the opening cost with the cost added.

March — equivalent units and unit costs
ABCD
1Flow of productionPhysical unitsDirect materialsConversion
2Work in process, beginning
3Started during March
4Completed and transferred out6,0006,000
5Work in process, ending500500250
6 % complete: materials / conversion
7Equivalent units (weighted average)6,5006,250
8Costs added during March
9Total cost to account for32,000,00019,500,00012,500,000
10Cost per equivalent unit3,0002,000
11Average cost per completed bag5,000
blue = input (edit me)grey = formula (click to see it)
The lecture also shows the “work done in the current period only” view (FIFO): deduct the beginning WIP equivalents (1,000 materials, 600 conversion) to get 5,500 and 5,650 equivalent units for March’s own work — the same 3,000 and 2,000 per bag because costs were stable.

Original lecture material

Open the file this page was built from: